Document Actions
Appendix B: Summary of Submissions
Questions 1-4
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
BCL
|
No comment
|
Optimise the channel allocation, polarisation & antenna type, especially at the RX end. Use multiplexing where appropriate. |
Yes provided appropriate and cost effective solutions are available. |
Needs further analysis of the interference potential of SRDs likely to use the STL band |
|
Cobalt Tech |
Could be used for stereo quality links using digital technology. e.g. 300 kHz at 64 QAM. |
Using digital STL provides two uncompressed stereo channel pairs in 500 kHz at 64 QAM. |
Not supported. Encourage studios to move outside the min distance. |
Digital STL enable a migration to less spectrum use and possible sharing with SRD in some cases. |
|
NZART
|
Likely to decrease because of higher noise level. Should be phased out as inappropriate for STL |
Reduce channel spacing to 200 kHz with cross polar or 300 kHz co-polar. |
Yes to encourage appropriate use of spectrum and modulation mode |
Increase education & enforcement to minimise the effect of SRD |
|
RBA
|
Felt actively discouraged by MED to use band. Expect demand up to same rate as 900 MHz |
Tests of a digital STL are currently underway. |
Not supported. Alternative terrestrial circuits have been found to be unreliable in urban areas |
If higher power SRD permitted then new band required for STL with long migration period and financial compensation. |
|
Radionetwork
|
Likely to be more demand now that industry is aware of its availability |
Possibly reduce channel spacing to 250 kHz but incompatible with older equipment. |
Not supported because it would favour studios just outside the limit and not fulfil the market needs fairly. |
Maintain the 3 mW limit and enforce the regulations where interference occurs. |
|
Radioworks
|
Demand would be similar to 900 MHz if made available for general use |
Digital may provide x2 increase. Compression is not an option |
No. Path length irrelevant.
|
Problem of Ministry's making. Financial compensation may be required if migration to other band is required |
|
StreamCom
|
|
Against the use of digital STL because they degrade the QOS while having little practical improvement in C/I. |
|
Increase the STL power budget by 20-30 dB and use more directive antennas. |
|
TeamTalk
|
Embargo on new licences and encouragement to migrate from land mobile bands should remain. |
Use higher gain antennas. |
|
|
|
Vern Talbot
|
Some demand if ministry imposed embargo removed. Some AM stations using 900 MHz when could use 400 MHz. Migration of these licences could free up some 900 MHz spectrum. |
Digital STL cost $11k |
|
Plan to migrate STL into new spectrum and require more directional antennas, lower power and multiplexing where appropriate. |
Questions 5-8
|
Submitter
|
Q5 |
Q6 |
Q7 |
Q8 |
|
BCL
|
Issues of latency and cascaded compression need to be addressed before encouraging migration to digital STL. |
Ref ITU-R guidelines for digital link design. |
Antenna requirements should be used to improve spectrum utilisation but they should be specific to each case. |
Additional bands which could be considered for STL are 845-849 MHz and 935-939 MHz. |
|
Cobalt Tech |
Bundle the STL licence with the broadcast licence. This would enable the Ministry to change STL licences to digital as demand dictates. |
C/I for co channel at 16 QAM is 16 dB. |
Limited benefits because often many of the links to a broadcast site are in a similar direction. |
Use of 5.8 GHz as an alternative delivery mechanism for multiplex programmes plus phone and data services. |
|
NZART
|
Higher licence fees for inefficient techniques plus sunset clauses. |
No comment
|
Yes for all new licences plus two years for existing licences to upgrade |
Consider 1.5 GHz as a more appropriate band |
|
RBA
|
Provide assistance in establishing feasibility. |
20 dB fade margin to overcome multipath effects |
Not supported because of size and RMA issues. |
Any sudden change to STL requirements could threaten the viability of a flexible, low cost and reliable broadcasting environment. |
|
Radionetworks
|
RSM to facilitate temporary changes to licences to permit testing of digital STL. Maintain current channel plan and use digital to enable multiplexing more audio channels per radio channel. |
20 dB fade margin to allow for multipath vulnerability of digital modulation. |
Not supported. Major problems with size and weight on towers. The benefits would be marginal in many cases because the paths towards the TX site are often from similar directions. |
Agrees with the future growth in radio stations requiring more STL licences. Additional spectrum identified as soon as possible. |
|
Radioworks
|
Assist with compatibility tests. Allocated a digital only band. |
Ref to overseas experience
|
Yes if it helps. Maybe RMA issues for larger antennas |
STLs have a 15-20 year attrition period. |
|
StreamCom
|
|
|
|
|
|
TeamTalk
|
Introduction of directional antennas, a review of the necessary power and an embargo on new licences for the same operator on the same path. |
The Australian antenna specification should be mandatory. Only the minimum power levels required for each path should be allowed. |
Definitely
|
In congested areas there should be technical justification why land line systems should not be employed |
|
Vern Talbot
|
Analogue output from studio and into TX suits analogue STL. Further processing in digital STLs degrades signal quality and increases cost. |
|
Improved antenna engineering may provide some benefits. |
|
